Urging democracy in Burma

AHMAD QISA'I
New Delhi
India
Jakarta Post
January 16, 2006

The comment by Hassan Wirayuda, Indonesia's Foreign Minister, on the need for Burma to move to a democratic setup needs to be scrutinized.

"Myanmar is disturbing the balance of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations", Foreign Minister Hassan Wirayuda told reporters in Jakarta, "And because of that we are asking it to show concrete steps toward democracy."

Furthermore, he said that Indonesia's experience of moving from an authoritarian regime to a democracy since the downfall of Gen. Soeharto in 1998 could be useful in helping to persuade Burma to introduce reforms.

Commenting on the internal matters of ASEAN members by other members has not been a practice since the beginning of the establishment of this group.

However, times seem to be changing and it is becoming common nowadays that members of ASEAN try to get more involved in the internal affairs of other members of the Association. It seems that Indonesia's Foreign Minister is getting used to this new practice.

By blatantly urging the military junta in Burma to show concrete steps toward democracy, Hassan has represented the official view of the Indonesian government on Burma's internal affairs. His statement can be understood as an effort by Indonesia to assert its influence on the Association. It is trying to regain its diminishing superior position in the region.

It is understandable that the sheer size of Indonesia in the region has urged it to attempt to regain the influence it once enjoyed in the region. Moreover, the current state of the Indonesian government supports this perception. The improvement in Indonesia's economic and socio-political condition in the past few years justifies the move.

And if Indonesia can maintain this condition, it will not take a long for it to regain its lost position. However, it should be noted here that the "success" claimed by the current government is far from satisfying. The current democratic practice of checks and balances between the executive and the legislative body seems to be eroding.